tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9126938162890035429.post3975463325160437028..comments2008-03-13T11:15:31.096-07:00Comments on A.G.H.O.S.T. Blog: Understanding EXIFAGHOSThttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05698295721133855819noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9126938162890035429.post-68310371233957356632008-03-13T11:15:00.000-07:002008-03-13T11:15:00.000-07:00A well-written article. Your conclusions are vali...A well-written article. Your conclusions are valid with respect to the content of the meta information, but the structure provides a signature which can often be used to determine if an image has been altered (but can't be used to prove emphatically that it hasn't). Use the exiftool -htmldump feature to see what I'm talking about.boardhead62http://www.blogger.com/profile/13200214358239391074noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9126938162890035429.post-25785161177010469472007-07-13T13:14:00.000-07:002007-07-13T13:14:00.000-07:00Awesome article! Thanks for writing this!Awesome article! Thanks for writing this!LBhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03302787844815963895noreply@blogger.com