Guest Article: Posted on behalf of AGHOST member Jody C.
The question has come up a few times in past months whether or not sellers and/or realtors are required to tell potential home buyers that a property may be haunted. Going by what I have studied (I’m a fledgling realtor), I'd say no.
Realtors should provide a potential buyer with an Abstract of Title, which summarizes all public records regarding a particular parcel, lists any transfers of ownership and divisions of property. If the property has ever had a lien or other encumbrance associated with it, that will also be shown in the Abstract of Title.
Sellers are required to disclose all Material Facts about their property, defined as:
While the following are excellent sources for creating residual energy and/or hauntings, they are NOT considered to be Material Facts and therefore are not required to be disclosed to a potential buyer:
"The fact or suspicion that the property, or any neighboring property, is or was the site of a:
This is all according to the realtor's code [RCW 18.86.010(9)].
So, unless a haunting is causing the building’s foundation to shift, the timbers to rot or the plaster to continually peel, it seems the chance that a buyer will be told ahead of time that their dream home comes equipped with an afterlife tenant is slim.
Note that this is a generalization. Some states require that if a buyer poses a direct question to a seller or Realtor about whether or not a death occurred on the property, they must answer honestly and to the best of their knowledge. When in doubt, though, ask a real estate attorney and they will let you know about your rights to full disclosure.
We Are Living In A Material World
Posted by
AGHOST on May 2, 2007
"Information that substantially adversely affects the value of the property or a party’s ability to perform its obligations in a real estate transaction, or operates to materially impair or defeat the purpose of the transaction."


1 comments:
Hi There,
I don't know about Washington law on disclosing a haunting, but in Oregon I have been told it is not required, whereas in California and in Hawaii, it IS required. Depends on what is meant by a "material fact" - the interpretation of which varies from state to staate.
(I'm a Realtor and I collect ghost stories and have a webpage on the subject, HauntedRealEstate.com and a new blog, HauntedRealEstateBlog.com)
Best regards,
Mary Pope-Handy
Post a Comment